TV, Magazine Ads More Effective Than Online?

A recent McPheters & Company study seems to show that television and magazine ads are more effective than their online counterparts.

The study used 30-second TV ads, full-page 4-color magazine ads and standard-sized Internet banner ads. Groups of respondents spent 30 minutes with a single medium in a laboratory setting. They watched their choice of sit-coms, read a magazine they selected, or randomly surfed the Internet for 30 minutes. After the session, each filled out a survey about ad recall and eye-tracking software was also used for the Internet ads. McPheters took the results and calculated net recall for each medium. Here’s some of what they found:

  • Net recall of TV ads was almost twice that of magazine ads
  • Magazine ad recall was almost three times that of Internet banner ads
  • Among web users, 63% of banner ads were not seen – respondents’ eyes passed over 37% of the Internet ads and stopped on slightly less than a third

Using these results and factoring in some other probability of exposure information, a full-page four-color magazine ad was determined to have 83% of the value of a 30 second TV commercial; a typical Internet banner ad has 16% of the value.

A couple of conclusions based on these numbers: the amount of time spent with a medium doesn’t necessarily translate to good, effective ad exposure, and online advertisers need to figure out how to better engage viewers with their ad content.
 
This study focused on magazines and television, but McPheters hopes to expand this type of study to include cable, newspapers, radio, and other types of Internet ads. Stay tuned.

Print, Email or Share:
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • FriendFeed
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Print
  • email
  • PDF

Post a Response